From: smoerk (smoerk_at_gmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 10 2004 - 12:30:09 PDT
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:40:52 +0100, Edmund Blackadder <edmund_at_helmug.gr> wrote:
> My main reason for writing this post is:
>
> The Einstein project.
>
> Not for its technicalities. But for its prospective.
>
> I think the Newton users as a community should make a controlled debate
> (maybe on a new list) about the future of Newton.
>
> With topics like:
>
> -Do we feel that the Newton hardware is aged enough ?
I guess there are people who like the Messagepad as it is and other
who would like to run NewtonOS on different hardware.
> -Do we feel that we must find a way to advance in hardware but at the
> same time preserve the NewtonOS?
Paul and Nicolas will do this anyway... :-)
> -What do we feel is the best way? The technically possible one? (Keep
> an open mind on this one....)
I see 3 different solutions:
a) Messagepad emulator that can run the NewtonOS from the ROM.
+ Paul and Nicolas are working on this
- Licensing problems. I guess you have to own a Messagepad to get the
NewtonOS legally.
- Not so easy to extend NewtonOS?
b) A NewtonOS clone from scratch (with binary compatibility)
- Much more work
+ Easier to extend
+ Better performance(?)
+ Available for everyone (no Newton ROM needed)
c) A Newton-like environment
- Newton applications don't run on it (but you can port it)
+ you can port it to any processor architecture.
> -How can we overcome the various legal and technical difficulties?
...
> -What should be the average workload of each solution? Are there enough
> people to make a project roll?
we will see...
> But I do believe strongly that we need to cooperate and communicate
> closely on this issue.
Why?
-- Oliver T. -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 10 2004 - 18:30:01 PDT