Re: [NTLK] FS SER-001 & EM300

From: Richard Kilpatrick (dmc12_at_btconnect.com)
Date: Fri Sep 24 2004 - 07:34:22 PDT

Next message: secondangel: "Re: [NTLK] PhotoShow and X-Port -- It works!"
Previous message: Peter H. Coffin: "Re: [NTLK] FS SER-001 & EM300"
In reply to: Shannan M.: "Re: [NTLK] FS SER-001 & EM300"
Next in thread: Goodwin, Greg: "Re: [NTLK] FS SER-001 & EM300"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 24 Sep 2004, at 15:12, Shannan M. wrote:

> What is the difference between the subsequent revisions of your board
> that makes your 3rd generation board different than the one that is
> being sold on ebay? What improvements were made that would make the
> board any different? Im just confused with your claim that the board
> is of poor quality...

I suspect a shill here.

Board quality is not the same as board design. Connectors need good
soldering, good mechanical as well as electronic design.

Richard

-- 
Tasty Other - Because Far Too Much in Life Makes Sense
Music for download - coming soon (RIP MP3.com)
G.A.S. http://www.dmc12.demon.co.uk/music/
Platform: PowerMac G5 2.0GHz Dual, 20" LCD, Logic, Hammerfall.
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: secondangel: "Re: [NTLK] PhotoShow and X-Port -- It works!"
Previous message: Peter H. Coffin: "Re: [NTLK] FS SER-001 & EM300"
In reply to: Shannan M.: "Re: [NTLK] FS SER-001 & EM300"
Next in thread: Goodwin, Greg: "Re: [NTLK] FS SER-001 & EM300"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 24 2004 - 08:00:02 PDT