Re: [NTLK] LIFO

From: William Pociengel (hseldon_at_my.wgu.edu)
Date: Sun Aug 21 2005 - 20:51:54 PDT

Next message: John Charlton: "Re: [NTLK] wanted - emate"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "[NTLK] Possible Newton virus?"
In reply to: Frank Gruendel: "Re: [NTLK] LIFO"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Frank Gruendel wrote:
>>There's only so much "ram" in my tiny brain and it's LIFO
>>(Last in, First out) so the further back in time the less
>>I can recall.
>
>
> Now maybe this is because my time as an active hardware
> developer has been over for a couple of years, but isn't
> this how a FIFO (First In, First Out) behaves?

yeap which then leads to poping the last thing off the stack and finding
out the stack is not empty. opppps I wonder what that's from and if it's
really the last then at what point did i use my data as an offset =8-O

proof that GOD was a real time programmer

go FORTH and MULTIPLY

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: John Charlton: "Re: [NTLK] wanted - emate"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "[NTLK] Possible Newton virus?"
In reply to: Frank Gruendel: "Re: [NTLK] LIFO"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 21 2005 - 21:00:03 PDT