Re: [NTLK] Newton packages versus OS X packages

From: Michael J. Hußmann (michael_at_michael-hussmann.de)
Date: Sun Feb 20 2005 - 13:04:28 PST


Norman Palardy (palardyn_at_shaw.ca) wrote:

> They are moving to a Unix model.
> Unix doesn't care about types and creators.

Thankfully, Mac OS X still isn't Unix -- that's why I'm still using a
Mac. The Unix features already included in Mac OS X (except memory
protection and preemptive multitasking which every modern OS supports)
are bad enough.

Anyway, one can support type and creator codes even with Mac OS X's Unix
underpinnings -- provided one wants to. Note that the problem with Newton
packages being mistaken for application packages only arises because
extensions are insufficient for properly differentiating different types
of files.

- Michael

Michael J. Hussmann

E-mail: michael_at_michael-hussmann.de
WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de
WWW (professional): http://digicam-experts.de

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 20 2005 - 14:00:02 PST