On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:29 AM, matthiasm <mm@matthiasm.com> wrote:
>
> I would suggest GPL if it is a stand-alone program. All work that
> would be derived would have to be GPL again (and "open"). This avoids
> commercial versions of the same patch that have only minor improvements.
Just a note, the BSD license still requires the original copyright
notice be retained when being redistributed in binary form, including
when modified, so you still know where the source has been used.
Morgan Aldridge
--- morgant@makkintosshu.com http://www.makkintosshu.com/ ==================================================================== The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/ The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/ The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/ WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/ ====================================================================Received on Mon Dec 29 11:56:18 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 29 2008 - 15:30:00 EST