Re: NTLK newt's fatal flaw

From: Marco Mailand (
Date: Fri Jan 07 2000 - 08:04:00 EST

Laurent Daudelin schrieb:
> Yes, I think that Victor is right. If somebody is ever to start it, he would be
> better off implementing his own, *well documented*, protocol, and create a
> package on the Newton to talk to the host application on the computer.
The longer I think about it, I must agree.

> However, that being said, without ever experiencing this, I've thought tha NCU
> was supposed to be expandable by adding new modules to it. So, depending on the
> documentation about how to do this, it might be easier to take this route, rather
> than re-inventing the wheel, since all the engine is there, in NCU (while some
> may argue not perfect).
What about using Sloup the Newton side? It's well documented, but AFAIR
does it not like to deeply nested soups. With all that MoreInfo crap in
Names I'm afraid, Sloup will refuse to transfer.


Regards / Viele Gruesse

Marco Mailand ****************************************** This month's NewtonTalk brought to you by:

EVOTE.COM, the ultimate Political Junkie site on the 'Net.

The Clinton Administration, the George Bush 2000 Campaign, and almost every other major U.S. politician has said something nasty about us at some time. Find out why at:


Need Subscribe/Unsubscribe info? Visit

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 01 2000 - 00:01:08 EST