Thanks for the input Steve. I think I'll use my scanner and one of my
collection of C+H books to make one of my own. I think anyone who is a big
enough fan to want a background picture, will have, or should have a copy of
one of Bill Watterson's books. I respect a guy who doesn't want his art
licensed to be put on t-shirts and such. Let's face it; C+H's philosophical
content and witty humor make it a target for the cheesiest perversions (ie
the Chevy and Ford pissing thing). At the same time, these are the qualities
that make it worth preserving, and what attracts me to it.
</end_rant>
-Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Vander Ark [mailto:vderark@bccs.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 7:54 PM
To: newtontalk@planetnewton.com
Subject: RE: NTLK Avis Backdrop picture Web site
> Also...any feedback on copyright issues? For example, I've created a great
> Calvin and Hobbes backdrop for myself..but would I be in trouble
> if I posted
> it as a backdrop for others to download? (Any lawyers out there? I'd
> appreciate your two cents on this.)>
Not a lawyer, a media specialist, and one of my responsibilities is
copyright; I read ridiculously large numbers of related books/articles/etc
and even go to the occasional conference on the subject. Basically, it's
pretty clear cut, although people like to try to see it "grayer" than it
really is. Legally you can't distribute anything with Calvin and Hobbes on
it to anyone, whether or not you make money from it. That would be true of
any licensed images, but Watterson is particularly tight-fisted with his
copyright. There are NO officially licensed products with Calvin and Hobbes
on them, I don't believe. All those little car stickers and things like that
are rip-offs and are blatantly illegal. So are the Star Trek stamps you can
get for NewtWorks, by the way, unless (and I think this highly unlikely)
someone actually got clearance from Paramount for them. Yeah right ;) The
web is full of copyright violations, which doesn't make them any less
illegal. There is at least one article on the web that I wrote for a
magazine six or seven years ago that I sold "First Rights" to and have the
contract to prove it. That means they are breaking copyright by publishing
it to the web, since I own the rights after their first publishing the
article in an issue of the magazine. That's a reputable publisher violating
copyright. It happens all the time.
Steve Vander Ark
Library Media Specialist
Byron Center Christian School
Byron Center, Michigan
******************************************
This month's NewtonTalk brought to you by:
EVOTE.COM, the ultimate Political Junkie site on the 'Net.
The Clinton Administration, the George Bush
2000 Campaign, and almost every other major
U.S. politician has said something nasty
about us at some time. Find out why at:
http://www.evote.com
******************************************
Need Subscribe/Unsubscribe info?
Visit http://www.planetnewton.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 01 2000 - 00:00:05 EST