on 8/15/01 6:02 AM, Paul Guyot at pguyot_at_kallisys.net wrote:
> Besides, there is no reason for Classic to relie on OS X for this
> kind of low-layer stuff except that the code already exists in X (but
> if it's not reliable, why should it use it?).
>
> BTW, the AppleTalk layer is part of Darwin.
Except that I thought that OS 9 (ie classic) no longer directly accesses the
hardware, but goes to OSX instead. That would mean that 9 does rely on OSX
for this low-layer stuff. Am I right, or wrong??
-- -Jon Glass Krakow, Poland <mailto:jonglass_at_usa.net> <mailto:glasshaus5_at_aol.com>-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:47:17 EDT