Re: [NTLK] OS X

• Next message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] OS X"
• Previous message: doppler: "Re: [NTLK] small printer driver"
• In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] OS X"
• Next in thread: Pelton, James: "Re: [NTLK] OS X"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Friday, August 17, 2001, at 10:49 AM, Jon Glass wrote:

> on 8/15/01 6:02 AM, Paul Guyot at pguyot_at_kallisys.net wrote:
>
>> Besides, there is no reason for Classic to relie on OS X for this
>> kind of low-layer stuff except that the code already exists in X (but
>> if it's not reliable, why should it use it?).
>>
>> BTW, the AppleTalk layer is part of Darwin.
>
> Except that I thought that OS 9 (ie classic) no longer directly
> accesses the
> hardware, but goes to OSX instead. That would mean that 9 does rely on
> OSX
> for this low-layer stuff. Am I right, or wrong??

Jon,

Again, you're completely right!

-Laurent.

--
=====================================================================
Laurent Daudelin              Developer, Multifamily, ESO, Fannie Mae
mailto:Laurent_Daudelin_at_fanniemae.com             Washington, DC, USA
********************** Usual disclaimers apply **********************
"Heuristics are bug ridden by definition. If they didn't have bugs,
then they'd be algorithms."
--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

• Next message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] OS X"
• Previous message: doppler: "Re: [NTLK] small printer driver"
• In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] OS X"
• Next in thread: Pelton, James: "Re: [NTLK] OS X"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:47:18 EDT