Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate

From: Samuel Jacobson (sjacobso_at_chuma.cas.usf.edu)
Date: Sat Jul 21 2001 - 02:02:52 EDT

Next message: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Previous message: Drew Loker: "Re: [NTLK] BTI Batteries"
Next in thread: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Reply: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Mark Rollins: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Dear All,
I am currently in graduate school and have become enamored with the
flexibility of the UMP2000/2100. Specifically I like that I can take all my
lecture, seminar, and conference notes (including graphical and scientific)
via the HWR and screen, as well as be able to work on papers and thesis
directly on the machine.

While I am familiar with the abilities of the UMP2000 I have never seen
thus used an eMate and was wondering what the consensus of this NUG might be
to which unit (uMP2000/2100 or eMate) would be better suited to a student
especially since I cannot afford a laptop and, again, am very lured by being
able to take notes directly into the machine...

Thank you all,

Sam

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Previous message: Drew Loker: "Re: [NTLK] BTI Batteries"
Next in thread: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Reply: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Mark Rollins: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:50:05 EDT