Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate

From: Woo Lee (vitcitylb_at_earthlink.net)
Date: Mon Jul 23 2001 - 23:56:11 EDT

Next message: Andrew C. Rempt: "[NTLK] newbie says thanks"
Previous message: Grant [Valuable Coupons] Hutchinson: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Maybe in reply to: Oliver Brose: "[NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Depends on what you were culturing under that hood?!?
Should've run it thru the Bunsen burner to burn off the ethanol and other
unknowns... :-D ...of course dipping the eMate in a nice heat-stable resin
first might save the nice 'racing green' exterior. LOL!
------------------
>I used to put my eMate into a tissue culture hood from time to time; the
>outside was wiped down with 95% ethanol and left to equilibrate in the
>laminar air flow but apart from a Bunsen burner being turned on within the
>hood, I wouldn't call it a hostile environment.
>
>--
>Ivan T. Shaw, PhD
------------------

!ooW %-)
http://www.newtontalk.net

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Andrew C. Rempt: "[NTLK] newbie says thanks"
Previous message: Grant [Valuable Coupons] Hutchinson: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Maybe in reply to: Oliver Brose: "[NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:50:12 EDT