[NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate

From: Oliver Brose (oliver.brose_at_t-online.de)
Date: Sat Jul 21 2001 - 13:21:51 EDT

Next message: Jim Johnston: "Re: [NTLK] Epson driver"
Previous message: PCBman: "[NTLK] SER-001 End of run"
Next in thread: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Mark Ross: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Reply: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Mark Ross: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> While the MP2X00's are much faster than the eMate (25 MHz vs. 160 MHz
> processors) the eMate may still be the best choice for your application.
> It is designed to be abused and has an internal keyboard which is far
> easier than HWR to enter accurate notes during a class

...if you're not thrown out for being so noisy.
I just had a small usenet discussion a few days ago, whether it is
appropriate to type during seminars and at other opportunities, when it is
basically silent.
This may be very dependable.

Regards,

Oliver :)

-- <SMACK> And another Palm hits the floor!

-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Jim Johnston: "Re: [NTLK] Epson driver"
Previous message: PCBman: "[NTLK] SER-001 End of run"
Next in thread: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Mark Ross: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Reply: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Mark Ross: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Maybe reply: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:50:06 EDT