Re: [NTLK] SER-001 and implant speed

From: Jim Witte (jswitte_at_bloomington.in.us)
Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 22:38:38 PDT

Next message: esworp: "[NTLK] soup toys and button errata..."
Previous message: esworp: "Re: [NTLK] notes and scrolling.."
In reply to: Drew Loker: "Re: [NTLK] Working SER-001"
Next in thread: Michael_Guzzo/Harmac_at_harmac.com: "Re: [NTLK] Working SER-001"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>1. I don't suppose this board in anyway circumvents the incompatiblity with
>the IMplant board?

I'm ventureing the answer to this is no. But could a buffer chip be
interposed between the serial-port lines and the CPU to compensate for the
increased clock speed when the implant is active? Or could the keyboard be
modified to put use a higher clock speed (it may use an extenal clock
signal, it doesn't look like there's an ocscillator in the kbd)?

Jim Witte

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: esworp: "[NTLK] soup toys and button errata..."
Previous message: esworp: "Re: [NTLK] notes and scrolling.."
In reply to: Drew Loker: "Re: [NTLK] Working SER-001"
Next in thread: Michael_Guzzo/Harmac_at_harmac.com: "Re: [NTLK] Working SER-001"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:37:03 PST