Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_mac.com)
Date: Mon Nov 12 2001 - 10:17:16 EST

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Synching to Mac Outlook 2001."
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] SysPatch 0.6"
In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Next in thread: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Reply: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Reply: James Elliott: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 12-11-2001 8:36, Jon Glass at jonglass_at_usa.net wrote:

> Do you know what would be really cool would be to have a separate addy that
> you send OT topics to, that would forward them to the list with the proper
> subject heading, and possibly a different header, that would simplify
> routing these messages to the "proper" place. :-)

And than give people the choice, with or without the 'OT List' so
effectively we'll have two lists......sigh

Robert Benschop

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Synching to Mac Outlook 2001."
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] SysPatch 0.6"
In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Next in thread: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Reply: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Reply: James Elliott: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:02:38 EST