Re: [NTLK] NiCd vs. NiMH

From: Marco Mailand (Newton2k1_at_mac.com)
Date: Thu Nov 22 2001 - 07:48:26 EST

Next message: Steven Scotten: "Re: [NTLK] Offline electronic newspaper functionality requested"
Previous message: Jakob Peterhänsel: "Re: [NTLK] Bad *pen* recognition"
In reply to: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] NiCd vs. NiMH"
Next in thread: Daniel Stacey: "Re: [NTLK] NiCd vs. NiMH"
Reply: Daniel Stacey: "Re: [NTLK] NiCd vs. NiMH"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> You must monitor the temperature for NiCads as well. The 110/120/130
> Newton models do this, they have a temperature sensor built in the
> battery compartment.
...but they recharge with only 50mA and are thus so hell slow charging that
they never warm up :-)

-- With best regards / Viele Gruesse!

Marco Mailand http://slsbd.psi.ch/timing

-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Steven Scotten: "Re: [NTLK] Offline electronic newspaper functionality requested"
Previous message: Jakob Peterhänsel: "Re: [NTLK] Bad *pen* recognition"
In reply to: Frank Gruendel: "[NTLK] NiCd vs. NiMH"
Next in thread: Daniel Stacey: "Re: [NTLK] NiCd vs. NiMH"
Reply: Daniel Stacey: "Re: [NTLK] NiCd vs. NiMH"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:03:39 EST