Re: [NTLK] offtopic: the cube?

From: Kim Howe (khowe_at_omninet.net.au)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 21:12:52 EDT

Next message: Christopher Plummer: "[NTLK] Higher sampling rate"
Previous message: Jeff: "[NTLK] Info"
In reply to: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] offtopic: the cube?"
Next in thread: Michael J. Hußmann: "Re: [NTLK] offtopic: the cube?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Thursday, October 4, 2001, at 04:53 AM, Laurent Daudelin wrote:

>
> on 10/3/01 4:15 PM, Philip Halsey at phalsey_at_provide.net wrote:
>
>> Whatever happened to the Cube? What problems did it have?
>
> I think its biggest problem was that it wasn't selling...

They had the price point wrong. It needed to be slightly cheaper than a
G4 Tower, not slightly more expensive. In the second hand market, they
have ended up there, which is where I bought mine. It's a great machine.

Kim Howe
kimhowe_at_synidcomm.com
Newton Forum Host on Syndicomm

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Christopher Plummer: "[NTLK] Higher sampling rate"
Previous message: Jeff: "[NTLK] Info"
In reply to: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] offtopic: the cube?"
Next in thread: Michael J. Hußmann: "Re: [NTLK] offtopic: the cube?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:01:36 EST