[NTLK] Higher sampling rate

From: Christopher Plummer (plumcakes_at_mac.com)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 21:37:43 EDT

Next message: Mark Ross: "Re: [NTLK] [ot]Re: Large Newton Case"
Previous message: Kim Howe: "Re: [NTLK] offtopic: the cube?"
In reply to: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Breaking the Newton Screen"
Next in thread: SlashDevNull: "Re: [NTLK] Higher sampling rate"
Reply: SlashDevNull: "Re: [NTLK] Higher sampling rate"
Reply: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Higher sampling rate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I like my new 2100's audio in capabilities, but 5 kbps is no where near
what I need. I'm a musician and have been putting off getting a tape
recorder or a minidisc recorder to record myself when I practice. I
only need to record 30 sec. to 1.5 min. so I can play it back and hear
myself. I would erase what I've recorded right away. Heck I'd probably
dedicate an entire 6 mb flash card for this task. What packages can I
use to get me up to at least 48 kbps maybe 96?

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Mark Ross: "Re: [NTLK] [ot]Re: Large Newton Case"
Previous message: Kim Howe: "Re: [NTLK] offtopic: the cube?"
In reply to: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Breaking the Newton Screen"
Next in thread: SlashDevNull: "Re: [NTLK] Higher sampling rate"
Reply: SlashDevNull: "Re: [NTLK] Higher sampling rate"
Reply: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Higher sampling rate"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:01:36 EST