Re: [NTLK] 2100 screw

From: Laurent Daudelin (laurent_daudelin_at_fanniemae.com)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 11:03:10 EDT

Next message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] airports and Newts [Tangent: Amtrak]"
Previous message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Higher sampling rate"
In reply to: Anthony Velasco: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 screw"
Next in thread: Jeremy Bond Shepherd: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 screw"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 10/3/01 10:32 PM, Anthony Velasco at ecotone_tv_at_hotmail.com wrote:

> How about depth? I was hesitant to sink the screw too far, but I figured
> that it would be at optimal height if I countersunk so the screw head was
> slightly less than the height of the surface-mounted IC's...unless further
> clearance is needed. Any further guidance/comment?

Countersink it until it fits and the screw will go in nicely. I didn't have
any problem.

-Laurent.

-- 
=====================================================================
Laurent Daudelin              Developer, Multifamily, ESO, Fannie Mae
mailto:Laurent_Daudelin_at_fanniemae.com             Washington, DC, USA
********************** Usual disclaimers apply **********************
"Heuristics are bug ridden by definition. If they didn't have bugs,
then they'd be algorithms."
--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] airports and Newts [Tangent: Amtrak]"
Previous message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Higher sampling rate"
In reply to: Anthony Velasco: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 screw"
Next in thread: Jeremy Bond Shepherd: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 screw"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:01:38 EST