Salutations,
That is my point. I did not mean anyone in particular and yet you seem to
feel a need to defend yourself and your opinions. Again.
I was careful not to mention iPod as 'the' product after the first
sentence. I was not even inferring the iPod as the 'product'. I meant a
general product and I was careful not to to be specific.
My question (now to be specific) is why someone would do the actions that
you are doing? I'm not saying that they are wrong or that you are wrong.
Nor am I saying that you need to defend yourself. I am just curious as to
why anyone would continually criticize a product? Is it to point out a
different product? Are you try to change someone's mind who thinks it is a
good product? If you change a person's mind would you be happy? If you
changed everyone's mind and made a product a complete flop would you brag
about that you made it flop or that you were right?
What I am asking is why someone would continually criticize a product?
I can understand if say 'A company was converting to windows instead of
buying Macs'. After all, everyone would be using windows rather than Macs
everyday.
But if there is a stand alone product that doesn't really affect someone
unless they buy it, why would someone continually criticize it? I see a
difference between continually praising a product and continually
criticizing it. Maybe there isn't.
David
>
> * SlashDevNull <SlashDevNull_at_mac.com> on Wed, 24 Oct 2001
> | It seems the iPod has the ability to bring great amounts of bitterness out
> | of people.
>
> Not iPod, Steve Jobs.
>
> | I really don't understand why someone would continually write about how
> | poor they think a product is.
>
> Not once have I said it was a poor product. I said that it is not nearly
> as great as Steve's hype. I said that it is not innovative and
> revolutionary. I said it is not a "breakthrough digital device". I
> provided very specific examples of how everything iPod does has been done
> before, and I qualified every one of them by stating that iPod does it
> smaller or faster, but not first.
>
> | I've been thinking about why someone would want to proclaim that a
> | product will fail and that it is the absolute worst idea in the world.
>
> I never said the product was the absolute worst idea in the world. I said
> the -marketing- of iPod is bad. I've spoken with five Macintosh owners
> today about iPod and all five have said, "no, I will not buy iPod". Two of
> those five are gadget-happy geeks. That bodes ill for iPod's sales.
>
> I say that iPod will fail as a standalone device because of its
> presentation. It is a niche accessory for a niche market. The market as a
> whole has demonstrated time and time again that such products never sell
> well unless they are bundled with a killer app or have a giant company like
> Sony (see MD) behind it to keep it alive. iTunes is nice and all but it is
> not the killer app that will drive iPod sales, and Apple is microscopic
> next to Sony.
>
> And before you get the wrong impression, I've been an MD consumer for about
> five years, now.
>
> | I it is not as if the criticisms would do any good. Maybe it is so later
> | they could say 'I told you so'. Maybe it is a way to 'get back' at the
> | company that makes the product. Maybe it is just to continually rebut
> | the arguments of the people who think it is a good product.
>
> Maybe it will cause someone to reconsider spending $400 on a product that
> hit a dead end before it was even announced.
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:02:35 EST