Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions

• Next message: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions"
• Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] iPod...watch out for RIAA!"
• In reply to: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions"
• Next in thread: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions"
• Reply: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions"
• Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> As long as we keep the S/N ratio below the levels of
> people actually leaving the list, then I think
> occational OT stuff should not only be tolerated, but
> accepted. We're people living in a world populated by
> other people. Conversations tend to get started!
> Ed
> web/gadget guru

True. But when you've subscribed to a list for a specific
purpose and 90+% of the traffic has nothing to do with the
Newton... well, I've got no plans to jump ship but it really
gets old fast.

John

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

• Next message: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions"
• Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] iPod...watch out for RIAA!"
• In reply to: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions"
• Next in thread: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions"
• Reply: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions"
• Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:02:37 EST