Re: [NTLK] O/T discussions

From: aaron tester (desktop_at_lavalink.com.au)
Date: Thu Oct 25 2001 - 03:54:02 EDT

Next message: James Simons: "Re: [NTLK] iPod hard drive physical size"
Previous message: Steve Weyer: "Re: [NTLK] VNC"
Maybe in reply to: SlashDevNull: "[NTLK] O/T discussions"
Next in thread: SlashDevNull: "[NTLK] Ipod infomercial - It is good - NO EDITORIAL :)"
Reply: SlashDevNull: "[NTLK] Ipod infomercial - It is good - NO EDITORIAL :)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

agreed, but in part i was discussing the non-pdaness of the ipod. a semi
O/T? just kidding...

aaron

>Salutations,
>
> While I agree topics should be related to the list, when something big
>happens I think a few off topic threads are fine. For maybe a couple days
>or until the messages just start repeating the same information.
>
> And of course, the off topic subject should be mentioned in the subject.
>
> So am I way off on this?
>
>David

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: James Simons: "Re: [NTLK] iPod hard drive physical size"
Previous message: Steve Weyer: "Re: [NTLK] VNC"
Maybe in reply to: SlashDevNull: "[NTLK] O/T discussions"
Next in thread: SlashDevNull: "[NTLK] Ipod infomercial - It is good - NO EDITORIAL :)"
Reply: SlashDevNull: "[NTLK] Ipod infomercial - It is good - NO EDITORIAL :)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:02:38 EST