Re: [NTLK] Deepest sympathy for the assassinated

From: Alexey Danilchenko (dalex_at_iname.com)
Date: Wed Sep 12 2001 - 03:26:11 EDT


John Del Pizzo <jdpizzo_at_yahoo.com> wrote:

> Mike,
>
> Obviously, you have not been paying attention to history. If people believe
> actions have no consequences, then they will continue to take them. To *not*
> retaliate is to invite additional and larger terrorists plots. To *not*
> punish the individuals and/or states that were involved only increases the
> likelihood of more innocent deaths. That is unacceptable.
>
> President Bush has my blessing to take whatever actions he deems necessary
> to protect the citizens of the U.S. and our allies around the world.

This does not justify killing innocent people. In fact there's no justify for killing innocent at all.

Suppose Bush will trace down the country where that terrorist group resides (it it was not just one suicidal group of crazy
people). Does it mean that you will have to declare war to that country? Why should innocent people of that country pay by
their life just because their stupid government hosted the terrorist group?

I agree that the terrorist people who commited this act of barbarian brutality should be punished and in a way that will be
remembered. But not at the cost of innocent human lifes. World already lost enough of it yesterday...

But I totally disagree with Bush (and Tony Blair) saying that they will punish any country/government that hosted the
terrorists. This stupidity could easily result in a World War III. And in case you don't realise the picture - this means
Apocalypse.

My deepest sorrow is for all victims of this and my deepest sympathy is to their families.

Alex

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 12:01:45 EDT