Re: [NTLK] OT: on OT

From: Ben Smith (QM Systems) (ben.smith_at_qm-systems.com)
Date: Wed Apr 24 2002 - 09:39:57 EDT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net
> [mailto:newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net]On Behalf Of Eric
> L. Strobel
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:07 PM
> To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
> Subject: Re: [NTLK] OT: on OT
>
>
>
> on 4/24/02 8:18 AM, Rich Lindsay at rich_at_www.thisoldnewt.com wrote:
>
> >
> > I set up an OT list a while ago.
> >
> > ANy interest in a sub list as long as the opinions are
> about topics and
> > not individuals?
> >
> > Rich
> > On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 03:28 PM, Steve Weyer wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> or perhaps there could be a separate OT list ?
> >
>
> I thought that the whole reason we put "OT" in off-topic
> discussions was so
> that people could filter that stuff out... Is this not working?
>
> - Eric.
>
> --
>
> Eric Strobel (fyzycyst_at_NOSPAM^mailaps.org)

True, but you still have to download them before you can apply any
rules to them, unless you have a mail client that lets you apply rules
at the server end.
Ben.

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun May 05 2002 - 14:04:54 EDT