IMHO i do believe that they made those statemnets knowing full well that we,
the community, would be reading the article. they knew we would read what
they said and maybe, just maybe, they said those things in order to get a
response from us. after all they are doing a study and if they really want
to know what makes us tick then one, they should use the newton as we do and
two, they should say hi every once in awhile. thanks for noticing us and
thanks for the comments, but i think they knew we would respond negatively
to them.
my .02
LAG
>Warning, possible self righetous rant ahead!
>A little less over analysis of the Newton user psyche please. We're not a
>group of neurotic superfans, we're intellgent consumers that know a good
>thing when we see it.
>
>Just my $0.02.
>
>-Eagan Rackley
>
>P.S. That said, I don't mean any offense to the people doing the study. I
>do
>think it very amiable that they would want to study the community in the
>first place. I just don't agree with everything that was said, and I am
>stating my opinionated opinion only.
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Sep 05 2002 - 10:05:44 EDT