Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100

From: John M. Powell (jp_at_iwillbefree.com)
Date: Thu Dec 05 2002 - 10:08:48 EST

Next message: Polenta Marco: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
Previous message: Ben Wells: "Re: [NTLK] Palm negative comments (was eMate vs Alphasmart Dana)"
In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
Next in thread: Johannes Wolf: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

MobileBackUp has a memory optimizer. I HIGHLY recommend a
backup though. I've used it a million times and have only
had a problem once, but when you do...

John Powell

> > The MP2100 has 4020k of system RAM,
> > while the MP2000 has, I do not remember exactly, 1000k ?
>
> My factory 2100 has a mere 3523k. I must have some horrible
> fragmentation or something... Time for a brainwipe? :-)
> --
> -Jon Glass
> Krakow, Poland

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Polenta Marco: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
Previous message: Ben Wells: "Re: [NTLK] Palm negative comments (was eMate vs Alphasmart Dana)"
In reply to: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
Next in thread: Johannes Wolf: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 01 2003 - 10:01:51 EST