On 08/02/02 12:28, "Rolf Brakvatne" <rbrak29_at_qwest.net> wrote:
> How is the e-mail download speed of a 2100 compared to that of an eMate
> (600K free memory with a 32MB card). This would be a DSL connection via a
> Farrallon card. 28 messages (small) take 6 to 7 minutes to download on the
> eMate. Would I see a large difference moving to a 2100.
I would roughly say around 3-5 times faster, mainly due to the 10 times
faster MP2x00 processor over the eMate's processor.
-Laurent.
-- ===================================================================== Laurent Daudelin Developer, Multifamily, ESO, Fannie Mae mailto:Laurent_Daudelin_at_fanniemae.com Washington, DC, USA ********************** Usual disclaimers apply ********************** benchmark n.: [techspeak] An inaccurate measure of computer performance. "In the computer industry, there are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and benchmarks." Well-known ones include Whetstone, Dhrystone, Rhealstone (see h), the Gabriel LISP benchmarks (see gabriel), the SPECmark suite, and LINPACK. See also machoflops, MIPS, smoke and mirrors.-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 10:02:18 EST