Question, why would you want a PC in your pocket (except for the geek
factor). When you already have a phone with 3G/PIM/mp3/camera capability
I really don't see the point of having a PC in your pocket anymore.
seriously the time I spend on my pc is pretty much like web, email, web,
Game a bit, get some work done, web, web ..... And it's not like u can
do anything special other than play MP3, check email and browse web
pages on some of those high end PDA (namely,i7xx, clie N7xx or maybe
some pocketpc thingy).
Well unless you are saying you wanna run 3d studio Max or you got some
very urgent programming assignment to do when you are on the way to
school.
2 14, 2002, at 12:52 , Ed Kummel wrote:
>
> I just got finished reading the Feb 11th issue of
> eweek, and John Taschek's Infrastructure article
> titled "Gadgets have taken over the world" makes the
> following statement:
> "...but clearly everyone's going to be packing PC
> power in their pockets and pocketbooks in the near
> future"
> This exactly contradicts $J's assessment of PDAs in
> where he claims to see no future in the devices. And
> if the above statement is found to be true, then Apple
> will be the only computing player in the tech market
> without a Personal sized computing platform.
> As a matter of fact, if Apple doesn't have plans for
> such a device at this point in time, and waits to see
> what the market will develop, then it will be too late
> and any attempt by Apple to play "catch-up" will fail
> miserably as they attempt to sway market share away
> from the already soon to be entrenched established
> players of WinCE and Palm.
> Ed
> web/gadget guru
> http://newton.tek-ed.com (download Newton packages)
> http://65.84.243.167 (my NPDS server)
>
> --- David Orriss Jr <dave_at_davenet.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> The numbers I've read are that Apple sold roughly
>> 800,000 newtons during
>> the lifetime of the product. The majority of them
>> were MP2x00 unit. That
>> number is probably higher because apple was actually
>> selling brand new
>> newtons until 1999 (due to contractual obligations
>> with various companies).
>>
>> Why *exactly* Steve killed the Newton is anyone's
>> guess. I'm willing to
>> bet it was a combination of "he didn't invent it"
>> with the fact that only
>> the 2k series became "marginally profitable" (to
>> quote Woz). Boils down to
>> simple $$$ I'm sure.
>>
>> I also remember someone talking on smaller.com about
>> the simple fact that
>> *everyone* left Apple that had significant knowledge
>> about the
>> Newton. They (almost) all went to Palm! I've heard
>> that SJ had expressed
>> interest in doing something with the Newton
>> technology to make it
>> profitable but that the knowledgebase to do that had
>> left and *that* was
>> why he killed it.
>>
>> Let's be realistic.. any guy who's willing to put an
>> ATI card in a computer
>> for resale has *got* to be focused primarily on
>> making a buck... ;)
>>
>> At 02:00 PM 2/13/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>>> Hey -
>>>
>>> Seeing as how Apple now publishes numbers of iMacs,
>>> iBooks, Powerbooks, iPods, G4s sold each quarter in
>>> their quarterly report, does anyone have access to
>> the
>>> historic sales numbers for the Newt over its years
>> of
>>> production?
>>
>
> =====
> Just because you're a genius, doesn't make you a smart guy!
> - The Powerpuff Girls -
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
>
> --
> This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
> To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
> mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
>
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 10:03:02 EST