Re: [NTLK] SER-001 rev B

From: IMNewtMan_at_aol.com
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 16:32:07 EST

Next message: Humphreys, David: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 rev B"
Previous message: Stephanie Maks: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 rev B"
Maybe in reply to: Humphreys, David: "[NTLK] SER-001 rev B"
Next in thread: Humphreys, David: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 rev B"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thanks!
Tom

In a message dated Thu, 21 Feb 2002 4:19:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, Stephanie Maks <newton_at_maksystems.com> writes:

>
> With the SER001 'classic', the interconnect does indeed still work fine. I
> suspect the rev B works the same.
>
> However, you cannot use both at the same time! You can use either
> interconnect, or SER001.
>
> -Stephanie

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Humphreys, David: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 rev B"
Previous message: Stephanie Maks: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 rev B"
Maybe in reply to: Humphreys, David: "[NTLK] SER-001 rev B"
Next in thread: Humphreys, David: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 rev B"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 10:03:32 EST