Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100 screen differences & idle curiosity.

From: Laurent Daudelin (nemesys_at_cox.rr.com)
Date: Wed Jan 16 2002 - 00:53:13 EST

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Suggestions for RSS/RDF news-sites?"
Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "[NTLK] Got a question? Check the FAQ (or somewhere else)!"
In reply to: Aron Hsiao: "[NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100 screen differences & idle curiosity."
Next in thread: Scotty Technoir: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100 screen differences & idle curiosity."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 15/01/02 21:09, Aron Hsiao at thoth_at_leapdragon.net wrote:
[snip!]
> Has anyone else noticed these differences? It would appear
> that my 2000u unit definitely has a different make/model
> touchscreen than my new 2100 units. I haven't yet decided
> which I prefer. I'm checking now to see if there are
> implications for battery life. Is anyone aware of other
> differences? Might there be further differences between the
> two products that I haven't discovered yet?

I've been using a 2100 for some time before I got a 2000 that I upgraded to
a 2100. I've never noticed any difference. Not that there isn't any, just
that I didn't notice them...

-Laurent.

-- 
=====================================================================
Laurent Daudelin            <http://home.cox.rr.com/nemesys>
Logiciels Nemesys Software         mailto:nemesys_at_cox.rr.com
candygrammar n.: A programming-language grammar that is mostly syntactic
sugar; the term is also a play on `candygram'. COBOL, Apple's Hypertalk
language, and a lot of the so-called `4GL' database languages share this
property. The usual intent of such designs is that they be as English-like
as possible, on the theory that they will then be easier for unskilled
people to program. This intention comes to grief on the reality that syntax
isn't what makes programming hard; it's the mental effort and organization
required to specify an algorithm precisely that costs. Thus the invariable
result is that `candygrammar' languages are just as difficult to program in
as terser ones, and far more painful for the experienced hacker.
-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Suggestions for RSS/RDF news-sites?"
Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "[NTLK] Got a question? Check the FAQ (or somewhere else)!"
In reply to: Aron Hsiao: "[NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100 screen differences & idle curiosity."
Next in thread: Scotty Technoir: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100 screen differences & idle curiosity."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 16:02:36 EST