Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100 screen differences & idle curiosity.

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_mac.com)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2002 - 02:40:05 EST

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] My new 2100"
Previous message: Steve Kramer: "Re: [NTLK] Was My new Newt"
In reply to: Mark Ross: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100 screen differences & idle curiosity."
Next in thread: rminton_at_commscope.com: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100 screen differences & idle curiosity."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 17-01-2002 3:25, Mark Ross at markross13_at_home.com wrote:

> The Newtons, unlike most other PDA's, usually don't have this problem even
> with a flat screen protector film because the surface has a slight roughness
> to it.

I might be wrong here, but wasn't there a slight difference in texture of
the screen surface between a 2000 and a 2100 ?

With so many people on the list that have both now
the answer shouldn't take long ;-)

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] My new 2100"
Previous message: Steve Kramer: "Re: [NTLK] Was My new Newt"
In reply to: Mark Ross: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100 screen differences & idle curiosity."
Next in thread: rminton_at_commscope.com: "Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs. 2100 screen differences & idle curiosity."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 16:02:38 EST