>
> It was only -the- most publicized case of 2000.
> <URL:http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,35933,00.html>
>
> | Nevertheless I greatly appreciate all of your time and feelings on the
> | discussion.
>
While I appreciate the link and, as a scientist, I would be the first to
say that I have no legal expertise whatsoever, I do not see how a ruling on
MP3's tranlates to a governing law on e-books. I suppose because of my
background I would need to see a ruling that either links MP3's to e-books,
or a specific ruling on e-books itself. Also, please forgive me but I do
not consider wired.com an authoritative source as I was expecting something
with what I consider to be a bit more legitamacy. Do you per chance know
the cite to the court case itself?
Evenso thanks for trying, I appreciate it.
Always,
Sam
_________________________________________________________________
Always remember, "Ad astra per aspera"...
email:
jacobson98_at_earthlink.net
or
sjacobso_at_chuma.cas.usf.edu
Lab. Telephone (via Dr. Susan Bell): 813-974-5420
SnailMail:
Department of Biology
University of South Florida
SCA 110
4202 East Fowler Avenue
Tampa, Florida, 33620
-- Have you checked the FAQ lately? http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe/manage: visit the above link. Questions: victor_at_newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:01:52 EST