My 2100 seems to work OK, even in the area of the crack?/scratch?,
except for one thing.
When I rotate the screen to landscape and use programs (ie. Pocket
Quicken) that have writing fields in the area of the crack and
horizontally from the area (3/4 in. wide), it has very erratic pen input
sometimes. The key word is 'sometimes'. This only occurs in the
landscape screen position. Pen inputs for buttons and pulldowns are fine
in the crack/scratch area. Is this normal in the 2100?
GEM has allowed me to return the 2100 for their inspection and possible
exchange after I e-mailed them a picture of the screen. I would cover
the shipping both ways. Worth returning it??
On Sunday, February 24, 2002, at 09:41 PM, Laurent Daudelin wrote:
> on 24/02/02 22:18, David Golden at ikondave_at_charter.net wrote:
>> on 2/24/02 8:58 PM, Rolf Brakvatne at rbrak29_at_qwest.net wrote:
>>> I just got back from a trip to discover that my 2100 from GEM had
>>> Not having had a 2100 (this is not the upgrade), here are my first
>>> impressions :
>>> 1. The unit appears in good (used) condition.
>>> 2. Screen has a half inch crack (not a scratch) in the lower portion
>>> the screen (Problem? Can the screen be replaced?)
>>> 3. One of the two rear cover holding clasps is missing (Anywhere I can
>>> get another?)
>>> 4. The battery appears to be OK, just needs to be cycled a few times.
>>> 5. Under memory info, it shows internal memory of 3984K. I thought the
>>> 2100 had 8000K
>> If I were you, I would try to get GEM to let you send that MP back in
>> exchange for one in better condition. A cracked screen is more then a
>> cosmetic problem. The replacement cost ( parts and labor ) could
>> easily run
>> $100 (?). I'd be interested in what some of the more knowledgeable list
>> members think.
> I would definitely call GEM and get it replaced. You can't do anything
> a cracked screen and I'm pretty sure that the touchscreen is totally
> The Apple repair, which is the only way to get the screen replaced,
> Calvin Grier comes with his replacements, runs at $180 plus shipping,
> might be more expensive than what this user paid initially to GEM to get
> this 2100.
> Again, I would definitely call GEM and *REQUEST* a replacement.
> Laurent Daudelin <http://home.cox.rr.com/nemesys>
> Logiciels Nemesys Software mailto:nemesys_at_cox.rr.com
> Brooks's Law prov.: "Adding manpower to a late software project makes it
> later" -- a result of the fact that the expected advantage from
> development work among N programmers is O(N) (that is, proportional to
> but the complexity and communications cost associated with coordinating
> then merging their work is O(N^2) (that is, proportional to the square
> N). The quote is from Fred Brooks, a manager of IBM's OS/360 project and
> author of "The Mythical Man-Month" (Addison-Wesley, 1975, ISBN
> 0-201-00650-2), an excellent early book on software engineering.
> This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
> To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
-- Have you checked the FAQ lately? http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe/manage: visit the above link. Questions: victor_at_newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:01:57 EST