Could you please provide a reference?
issue, page, name of the author ...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net
> [mailto:newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net]On Behalf Of Jochen Schäfer
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:20 AM
> To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
> Subject: Re: [NTLK] PDA article in "Der Spiegel"
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:39:40 -0500 (EST), James Witte wrote:
> >> Yeah, today that is true. I think the author meant the NOS 1.x
> >> recognition, which was a pain.
> > But didn't the article mention (or show) a 2100? The original HW was
> >bad (but might still have been better than anything else out there), but
> >the 210 improved on it greatly as well as having a faster processor.
> No. Ther was a image of an MP2000. Which is the really funny side of
> this article.
> The author obviously writes something that is true about the first
> Newtons, but
> illustrating this with the Newton that is much better.
> So my conclusion on this: The author is at best totally ignorant, no
> more, no less.
> Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
> Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
> This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:02:37 EST