Re: [NTLK] re- QTake, was --where have all the good newts gone?

From: Seth Hurwitz (shurwit1_at_jhmi.edu)
Date: Thu May 30 2002 - 10:15:34 EDT

Next message: Michael J. Hußmann: "Re: [NTLK] Programming: tracking pen input"
Previous message: L vRooy: "[NTLK] re- QTake, was --where have all the good newts gone?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I was just thinking about this. But checking the FAQ I was disappointed
to discover the QuickTakes don't work with Tibet.

>>> ara_at_dwaf.pwv.gov.za 05/30/02 10:10AM >>>

Chris Searles wrote:
--Hey, I bought a QucikTake 100 off of ebay for posting pictures to the
web
--and although not perfect they're not all that bad. (Especially when
you
--don't have enough money for a good digital camera.) I even had a
couple
--of the pictures printed out as 3x5s and both me and the guy at the
camera
--store were surprised how nice they turned out for a 640x320
resolution.

Any idea what the QTake 200's resolution was? I have a chance to buy
one.

Les

-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

Next message: Michael J. Hußmann: "Re: [NTLK] Programming: tracking pen input"
Previous message: L vRooy: "[NTLK] re- QTake, was --where have all the good newts gone?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jun 12 2002 - 20:02:56 EDT