Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?

From: John Anderson (dearjohn_at_everchanging.com)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 00:54:21 EST

Next message: John Charlton: "Re: [NTLK] Dvorak (was clie (OT))"
Previous message: C.W. Otto Sohn: "Re: [NTLK] NaPalm: it's for real."
In reply to: Cam Marshall: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Next in thread: Michael Kennard: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Reply: Michael Kennard: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

It's last priority. TCP/IP is my next priority, then iCal sync. After
that, IrDA, but only if it doesn't hold development back a whole log
(although I don't expect it to)

John Anderson
everchanging

On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 07:09 PM, Cam Marshall wrote:

> Just out of curiosity, do you plan IrDa support any time soon?

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/

Next message: John Charlton: "Re: [NTLK] Dvorak (was clie (OT))"
Previous message: C.W. Otto Sohn: "Re: [NTLK] NaPalm: it's for real."
In reply to: Cam Marshall: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Next in thread: Michael Kennard: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Reply: Michael Kennard: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 12:04:19 EST