Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?

From: Michael Kennard (mkennard_at_optushome.com.au)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 02:41:13 EST

Next message: John Anderson: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Previous message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
In reply to: John Anderson: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Next in thread: John Anderson: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Reply: John Anderson: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John,

Is it possible when you announce an update to put a link in the email
even if it is a Versiontracker link please. I hope it doesn't sound
like I'm lazy.

michael

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/

Next message: John Anderson: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Previous message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
In reply to: John Anderson: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Next in thread: John Anderson: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Reply: John Anderson: "Re: [NTLK] Version 0.1m posted -- worthy of VersionTracker update?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 12:04:22 EST