Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Wed Sep 04 2002 - 23:54:36 PDT

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Stupid question of the day"
Previous message: Steve Vander Ark: "[NTLK] Stupid question of the day"
In reply to: Johannes Wolf: "Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?"
Next in thread: Bernie A. Goltermann: "Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 05-09-2002 8:48, Johannes Wolf at mp2100_at_mail-gw.estec.esa.nl wrote:

> The reason is that the registration of Dateman seems to be coupled to the
> unique hardware ID which every MP2x00 Newt has.

Sorry, but that isn't true. Though some applications do use this routine
DateMan isn't one of them. The tip of checking your Owner Name very
carefully made sense to me, waiting for the answer...

Robert Benschop

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Stupid question of the day"
Previous message: Steve Vander Ark: "[NTLK] Stupid question of the day"
In reply to: Johannes Wolf: "Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?"
Next in thread: Bernie A. Goltermann: "Re: [NTLK] Standalone's DateMan on a new(er) newton?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 26 2003 - 12:59:20 PDT