Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?...

From: Bograt (bograt__at_talk21.com)
Date: Wed Apr 30 2003 - 10:31:15 PDT

Next message: Chris Ruprecht: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates - and a question"
Previous message: Joe Anthenat: "[NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
In reply to: Joe Anthenat: "[NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Next in thread: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Reply: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Reply: Karel Jansens: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wednesday, April 30, 2003, at 06:26 pm, Joe Anthenat wrote:

> Surely someone's considered this before...

I sincerely doubt it, i mean there is no point, the 2k is far more
aesthetically pleasing than the emate, well others may have different
opinions but I do not like the way in which the emate looks.

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Chris Ruprecht: "Re: [NTLK] iPod mutates - and a question"
Previous message: Joe Anthenat: "[NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
In reply to: Joe Anthenat: "[NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Next in thread: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Reply: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Reply: Karel Jansens: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 14:30:01 PDT