From: Karel Jansens (kareljansens_at_tiscalinet.be)
Date: Wed Apr 30 2003 - 14:10:30 PDT
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 19:31, Bograt wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 30, 2003, at 06:26 pm, Joe Anthenat wrote:
> > Surely someone's considered this before...
>
> I sincerely doubt it, i mean there is no point, the 2k is far more
> aesthetically pleasing than the emate, well others may have different
> opinions but I do not like the way in which the emate looks.
Indeed. The eMate looks like a derelict prop from a refused 'Alien' flick.
You'd expect it to hatch into something slimey that is only interested in
sucking your brains out.
At least with a 2100 next to my bed, I can sleep quietly.
:)
-- Karel Jansens. Don't send me HTML-based e-mails, my mail program is set up to ignore them. If you don't know what this means, ask someone or get off the Internet. -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 14:30:01 PDT