Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?

From: Edward Humes (ehumes_at_mac.com)
Date: Wed Apr 30 2003 - 11:31:36 PDT

Next message: Bograt: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Previous message: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
In reply to: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wednesday, April 30, 2003, at 11:23 AM, Victor Rehorst wrote:

> Restoring a 2000's backup onto a 2100 will have no ill effects. Only
> packages, soup data, and system configuration settings are backed up,
> not OS
> patches or anything like that. Your HWR learning will also be
> restored - it's
> stored along with your user preferences.
>
That's great -- and certainly makes life easierl! Thank you Victor and
Laurent.

Ed Humes

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Bograt: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
Previous message: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] Emate 2100?..."
In reply to: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
Reply: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] Differences between 2100 and upgraded 2000?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 13:00:01 PDT