Re: [NTLK] 120 ROM question...

From: Laurent Daudelin (laurent_daudelin_at_fanniemae.com)
Date: Fri Jan 31 2003 - 07:51:14 PST

Next message: Martyn Wilkinson: "Re: [NTLK] Revisiting that old idea: Build our own Newton"
Previous message: Sunder: "Re: [NTLK] Anybody want a PPC disassembly of the InkWell framework?"
In reply to: tfbiii_at_nbscomputers.net: "Re: [NTLK] 120 ROM question..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 31/01/03 10:43, "tfbiii_at_nbscomputers.net" <tfbiii_at_nbscomputers.net>
wrote:

> Well, neither am I for that matter. Maybe the proper question would be
> "Can we MAKE a 2.0 ROM chip for a 120?" Would it be more cost-effective
> to just get a 2100 or U2K?

I think it would be much more cost effective to get a 2100 or an U2K...

-Laurent.

-- 
===========================================================================
Laurent Daudelin                    Developer, Multifamily, ESO, Fannie Mae
mailto:Laurent_Daudelin_at_fanniemae.com                   Washington, DC, USA
************************* Usual disclaimers apply *************************
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Martyn Wilkinson: "Re: [NTLK] Revisiting that old idea: Build our own Newton"
Previous message: Sunder: "Re: [NTLK] Anybody want a PPC disassembly of the InkWell framework?"
In reply to: tfbiii_at_nbscomputers.net: "Re: [NTLK] 120 ROM question..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 08:00:03 PST