Re: [NTLK] ser-001

From: E. Male (mrramsay_at_hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 08 2003 - 13:21:03 PDT

• Next message: Q: "[NTLK] help, New to NTLK, the newton and newtVNC"
• Previous message: Ferdi: "[NTLK] ser-001"
• Maybe in reply to: Ferdi: "[NTLK] ser-001"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I also agree with Ferdi. I have never had a port fail, but the SER-001 will
sure enough prevent that from happening.

D

>From: "Ferdi" <fozguner_at_ualberta.ca>
>
>I have religiously been using my Newton 2100 for the past 3 years and have
>never had any problems with my interconnect port. I feel that the ser-001
>is a good investment when (and only when) the interconnect port fails.
>I don't know what kind of stress you put your interconnect ports
>through...they seem to be failing all over the place from what mentioned on
>the list.
>
>simple insertion and removal.
>
>Cheers
>Ferdi

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: Q: "[NTLK] help, New to NTLK, the newton and newtVNC"
• Previous message: Ferdi: "[NTLK] ser-001"
• Maybe in reply to: Ferdi: "[NTLK] ser-001"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 08 2003 - 13:30:00 PDT