Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6 - FAT vs. Speed

From: Paul Guyot (pguyot_at_kallisys.net)
Date: Fri Oct 17 2003 - 15:18:09 PDT

Next message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6"
Previous message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6"
In reply to: DJ Vollkasko: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6 - FAT vs. Speed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Aux environs du 17/10/03 à 12:05 +0200, sous le titre "Re: [NTLK]
[ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6 - FAT vs. Speed", DJ Vollkasko prit sa plus
belle plume pour écrire les mots suivants:
>FAT now. Speed next. Then FAT32. *grin*

By FAT, I mean FAT12, FAT16 and FAT32.

Paul

-- 
Changement de baignoire.
NPDS/NewtonOS: http://newton.kallisys.net:8080/
Apache/FreeBSD: http://www.kallisys.com/
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6"
Previous message: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6"
In reply to: DJ Vollkasko: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6 - FAT vs. Speed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 17 2003 - 16:00:01 PDT