Re: [NTLK] Rex 3 or 6000

From: Richard Clark (mawgadog_at_tin.it)
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 08:40:53 PDT

Next message: Andrei Chichak: "[NTLK] Comments about maximum memory size"
Previous message: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
In reply to: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Rex 3 or 6000"
Next in thread: Daniel Padilla: "Re: [NTLK] Rex 3 or 6000"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 27 Apr 2004, at 8:06 AM, Martin Joseph wrote:

> That seems absurd to me. Why would it act like a modem?
>
> I guess we may never know though...
> Marty

not sure the rex 3 didn't it was recognized as storage but the 6 is
like a modem for some reason.

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Andrei Chichak: "[NTLK] Comments about maximum memory size"
Previous message: Doug Augustyn: "Re: [NTLK] 2100 heap: 173kB or 349kB???"
In reply to: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Rex 3 or 6000"
Next in thread: Daniel Padilla: "Re: [NTLK] Rex 3 or 6000"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 09:00:02 PDT