Re: [NTLK] Microsoft MN-520 successful

From: Peter H. Coffin (hellsop_at_ninehells.com)
Date: Wed Aug 25 2004 - 13:04:44 PDT

Next message: Steele Campbell: "Re: [NTLK] Motherboard 2000-2100"
Previous message: Peter H. Coffin: "Re: [NTLK] another SimpleMail question"
In reply to: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Microsoft MN-520 successful"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:55:55PM -0400, Victor Rehorst wrote:
> What matters is the thickness of the right tab. If it is 'thick' (at least
> half as thick as the connector) then it is a 3.3V operation card. If it is
> 'thin' then it is a 5V card or 5V/3.3V card.

All three tabs look the same size.

> A better way to answer this is: does it fit in an eMate?

Send me an eMate and I'll test it for you. (:

-- 
Christmas is weird. What other time of the year do you sit
in front of a dead tree and eat candy out of your socks?
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Steele Campbell: "Re: [NTLK] Motherboard 2000-2100"
Previous message: Peter H. Coffin: "Re: [NTLK] another SimpleMail question"
In reply to: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Microsoft MN-520 successful"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 25 2004 - 13:30:01 PDT