From: Norman Palardy (palardyn_at_shaw.ca)
Date: Thu Jan 08 2004 - 22:46:40 PST
On 8-Jan-04, at 11:23 PM, David M. Ensteness wrote:
> Well, I wasn't the man who said it, nor do I agree, but he has a point
> and I will try to explain it:
>
> The TAM was a very ambitious project, tons of demos were created,
> however, the specs of the system kept dropping over time.
The hardware version of Copland ?
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 08 2004 - 23:30:00 PST