Re: [NTLK] [Q] ImageInBox and SimpleMail 4.3 (was Re: [ANN] ImageInBox beta)

From: josh musket (jmusket_at_nmu.edu)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 06:53:47 PDT

Next message: josh musket: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] deja vu, ipod gets its own division"
Previous message: Scot McSweeney-Roberts: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] deja vu, ipod gets its own division"
In reply to: DJ Vollkasko: "[NTLK] [Q] ImageInBox and SimpleMail 4.3 (was Re: [ANN] ImageInBox beta)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

DJ Vollkasko wrote:

>Q 1: That's the Mail V website, so is this a Mail V-specific Image
>Stationary, or is that the same as in Simon's SimpleMail 4.3 distribution?
>
As far as I can tell, ImageInbox is standalone of the mail clients,
though I assume it needs that a stationary from MailV. I've IROBEXed
JPEGs over from this craptop. I don't have MailV installed, nor have I
tinkered with SimpleMail's setup to the point I can use it.

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: josh musket: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] deja vu, ipod gets its own division"
Previous message: Scot McSweeney-Roberts: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] deja vu, ipod gets its own division"
In reply to: DJ Vollkasko: "[NTLK] [Q] ImageInBox and SimpleMail 4.3 (was Re: [ANN] ImageInBox beta)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 24 2004 - 07:30:02 PDT