Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_telebyte.nl)
Date: Sat Oct 16 2004 - 00:36:39 PDT

Next message: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] New usermap is released!"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] display upgrade"
In reply to: Raj Patel: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 16-okt-04, at 4:34, Raj Patel wrote:
>> - Is the OQO a platform for Einstein?
> In fact if 'Einstein' has some kind of open source base (eg embedded
> Linux) then chances are it can be abstracted sufficiently from any
> hardware so as not to make hardware an issue.

If I understood correctly Einstein should be done on an ARM processor
to avoid extra coding etc.

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] New usermap is released!"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] display upgrade"
In reply to: Raj Patel: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Next in thread: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Oct 16 2004 - 02:30:02 PDT