From: Martin Joseph (martyNT_at_barknaturalpet.com)
Date: Sun Sep 05 2004 - 21:44:40 PDT
On Sep 5, 2004, at 6:50 PM, Jared Bland wrote:
>> UL and CSA are very strict about the power comsumption figures put on
>> electronic devices. If it says 180W, then that's a few percent over
>> what a fully loaded system is going to run at full speed. It's
>> determined by testing at the agencies, not Apple.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, September 5, 2004, at 06:46 PM, Jim Witte wrote:
>>
>>> Do we know that it's actually 180, thought? Doesn't seem to me that
>>> there would be anything in there that isn't in an iBook, and it'll
>>> run
>>> off 24VDC*1.9A = about 45 W.
>
> Looking back to before Mike's post, I'd like to respond that there's a
> G5 processor in the iMac and a 17- or 20-inch screen.
>
It's also completely silly to think it's a tablet "because it looks
like one". It has no durability or touch screen or battery etc...
Also I wonder if like the TAM and the cube it has a big honkin' inline
transformer we don't see in all the pretty pictures?
Marty
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 06 2004 - 01:00:02 PDT