Re: [NTLK] Newton packages versus OS X packages

From: David M. Ensteness (denstene_at_mac.com)
Date: Sun Feb 20 2005 - 16:37:00 PST

Next message: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] Newton packages versus OS X packages"
Previous message: Michael J. Hußmann: "Re: [NTLK] Newton packages versus OS X packages"
In reply to: Michael J. Hußmann: "Re: [NTLK] Newton packages versus OS X packages"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton packages versus OS X packages"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

uhm ... maybe we should have asked "How?" rather than "Like?"

Cause what you came back with ... didn't really give any examples of
how UNIX features are bad.

David

>> Like ?
>
> On the other hand, it is grossly inadequate on a personal computer with
> typically just one user who is also doing admin duty (because there's
> no-
> one else to do this job).
>
> - Michael

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: David M. Ensteness: "Re: [NTLK] Newton packages versus OS X packages"
Previous message: Michael J. Hußmann: "Re: [NTLK] Newton packages versus OS X packages"
In reply to: Michael J. Hußmann: "Re: [NTLK] Newton packages versus OS X packages"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Newton packages versus OS X packages"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 20 2005 - 17:00:02 PST